It was a bit drawn out where it was easy to start to lose interest at points.

Greenland is worth a watch, despite the BIG story holes and improbabilities, one of which is the key element of blowing up a 30 minute story to a 120 minute movie. Nathan, John's son, is diabetic. As soon as this is discovered, they are rejected from the flight to the bunkers. Improbable: If the government went to length to select certain families based on their skill sets, they would definitely include a screening of the potential evacuees' health history. In the beginning, when the Presidential message comes through it says: Only the selected, no add-ons, no exceptions. In the end though, private planes with Joe and Jill Shmoes fly to Greenland and the government, which instated the no exception rule, suddenly lets them into their bunker? There is a reason, why those rules were made up. Only healthy people, because of a lacking supply chain of medication afterwards. So why feed a person during their stay in the bunker if they die during or after that stay. Same with the calculated number of people in that bunker. There is a capacity for air pumps etc. So no, the UNselected would never get in, especially if they don't have a desirable skill set and training.

Movie was overall good but had no real storyline, just jumped into action. Not really sure where the meteors came from and why specific people were picked but all was able to get int o the bunker in Greenland.

Too long. Too boring.